This article from a few years ago popped up on Twitter today:
White people’s bland food isn’t just an internet meme. It’s a centuries-long obsession
The article is pretty much what you’ll think it’s going to be. A lot of yammering about religion, history, privilege, blah, blah, blah. The usual buzz-word salad that’s all too common in any piece that can be used to denigrate white people, white culture, white anything.
But throughout all of it, an obvious point was left unmentioned. Why do a lot of people like “bland” food? Maybe… because they *like* “bland” food. I am one such. I am perfectly capable of making a satisfying meal out of little more than noodles. *Just* noodles. Or plain rice, a mashed potato, an unadorned chunk of chicken. A fine meal can be made from mixing peanut butter with oatmeal. Is it because I like “bland?” No. It’s because the flavor is perfectly satisfying. What people like the author of the linked article don’t seem to grasp is that people’s senses are on a spectrum. Women, for example, apparently see colors far more clearly than men do. Some people can hear a pin drop, and would be in physical agony to be subjected to the conversational level of the average Friday night at the local bar. Some people can’t smell much of anything and thus drown themselves in perfume; others can pick up the slightest hints of odor from across the room.
Foods that this author, and apparently many others, would find completely lacking in flavor would be a riot of taste sensation to someone else. Subjecting that person to a pile of seasoning would be to simply overload their senses for no good reason.
I am comfortable in temperatures others might find frigidly cold. I like the lights turned a little dimmer than standard; a nice sunny day is blinding. Some of this is doubtless due to random chance; some of it doubtless due to the northern European portions of my muttly breeding. And perhaps that plays into food: while spices have been present in northern Europe since forever, they were not as plentiful as elsewhere. Many of my ancestors were probably lucky to survive on simple grain, mutton, chicken, that sort of thing. Their foods were likely less “foody” than people from the Mediterranean, the Middle East, India, Africa, etc. Thus they evolved to deal with that. That was normal for them. One might wonder if that made their sense of taste sharper, more keen compared to some others.
So if you’re like me and a bowl of mac and cheese actually sounds pretty good, don’t let goons like the author of the piece shame you. Take pride in the fact that you don’t *need* to shower your food with extravagances in order to be happy and satisfied.
6 responses to ““Bland Food””
I thought making do with less was a good thing.
Usually, in cities fresh food is more expensive so poor people find a lot of way to cover the taste or its really tough so they find ways to make it tender. With fresh good quality food this is unnecessary so with the wealth Americans came into after WW2 most switched to finding good food. Food was more bland.
Now its more “cool” to eat foreign foods or spicy foods so people complain about bland,
This ignores how every redneck has tons of spices and/or hot sauce.
Heh, exactly. This racial stereotype article ignores the original American taste for spiciness in the South.
I do wonder if there might be some correlation between climate and spice-preference. Take bland-food-eating northern Europeans and move them down to the Mediterranean or the Middle East or India or Alabama, they start dumping spices on everything. Perhaps as the planet warms we’ll see Canadians putting ghost peppers in their poutine.
I was always led to believe hot countries used spices to hide when meat was getting past its prime
In addition, most spices came from these climates, which were what the Dutch and British East India companies were founded to import, initially at very high prices (hence terms like peppercorn rent)
That doesn’t actually work. Please don’t ask me why I know.