Where LazerPig savages the supposedly superior Russian T-14 tank. Turns out… it’s kind of a joke.
T-14 Armata: That’s Gotta Hurt
Recent Posts
Categories
- AARRRGH
- Aircraft
- APR
- Art
- Awesomeness
- B-47 and B-52 Origins and Evolution
- blather
- Book 4
- Books
- CAD Diagrams
- Cats
- Crazy
- Critters
- cyanotype blueprints
- Drawings
- Dumbassery
- eBay
- Forward
- Gah
- history
- Hmm…
- Humor
- I'm from the government
- Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Origins and Evolution
- Meh
- Models
- Monthly Historical Documents Program
- My Fiction
- New Products
- News
- Nuclear Pulse Propulsion
- Nukes
- Paleo
- Patreon
- photography
- Politics
- projects
- Religion
- Reshaping the world
- rockets
- Russian Empire
- Sales & Specials
- science
- Science Fiction
- Ships
- spacecraft
- That Was Odd
- Uncategorized
- US Fighter Projects
- US Launcher Projects
- US Research & Recon Projects
- US Supersonic bomber projects Vol 1
- US Supersonic Bomber Projects Vol 2
- US Transport Projects
- US VTOL Projects
- War With The Deep Ones
- Weapons
- Wisdom
- Worldwreckers
- youtube
- YouTubers worth watching
- ಠ_ಠ
Archives
- December 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
2 responses to “T-14 Armata: That’s Gotta Hurt”
Sitting down and looking at the specs from a variety of sources, I see why people have been a bit freaked out by this thing. The video contradicts just about everything else available to me, so I don’t know what to think.
What strikes me is the sensor suite. I don’t see Russia being able to afford the kind of multifunction arrays this thing supposedly has on the prototype. If they can, that alone would be an issue. In terms of protection, particularly the active protection systems, who knows….
Bottom line, this is also a doctrine thing. Properly supported, any tank is a problem for dismounted infantry. I would rather have an M-48 backed up by a good mortar section and a troop of good scouts than an M-1A2 with a bunch of chuckleheads.. Particularly going up against a defensive position.
Having armor chassis for other vehicles besides tanks would be good for morale.
Now for armored fuel carriers:)
Where China may help them might be in the drone department.
Now, infantrymen with MANPADS have the advantage…but if mass produced swarming drones force them and light armor off the battlefield…an all armor footing seems more wise.